The Discipline of Less: Inside ISTO.’s Philosophy of Restraint - A Conversation with Co-Founder Pedro Palha.

There is a Portuguese word that translates simply as this. Plain. Ungilded. Indicating rather than declaring. ISTO. chose it not as a flourish but as a limit: this, and no more than this. In an industry conditioned to confuse excess with meaning, such restraint already constitutes an argument.

ISTO. did not emerge with a manifesto so much as a refusal. Founded in Lisbon, outside the gravitational pull of fashion capitals and investor cycles, the brand formed around a single insistence: that quality, price and ethics should align without theatrics. The city matters less as aesthetic than as condition - a place where craft still operates at human scale, where decisions remain close to their consequences, and where slowness is not yet a liability.

Restraint at ISTO. is operational before it is visual. Fewer products. Fewer seasons. Fewer reasons to speak. The brand advances not by expansion but by calibration, treating each release as a system under stress-testing rather than an opportunity for novelty. What remains is not minimalism as style, but clarity as method.

This. And no more than this.

That logic surfaces in the garments without announcing itself. A shirt descended from the Oxford lineage, for instance, is softened through garment dyeing until its formality dissolves. Colour settles unevenly, as it should. Structure relaxes. The result is a piece that does not perform versatility but inhabits it - one that moves across the week without changing register. It recalls Roland Barthes’ notion of the neutral: not the absence of meaning, but its suspension, allowing use to eclipse symbolism.

Similarly, a pair of pleated linen trousers quietly resolves a series of tensions. Linen, historically split between work and leisure, is allowed to behave honestly - to crease, to breathe, to register time. The pleat is not nostalgic quotation but functional architecture, a small intervention that introduces movement without drama. These are garments designed to cooperate with the body rather than direct it, assuming repetition, climate and habit as constants.

This is where ISTO.’s position sharpens: clothing as infrastructure rather than expression. Like good civic design, it succeeds by receding. Its value lies not in recognition but in disappearance - the moment when a garment stops asking to be noticed and starts being relied upon.

Sustainability, in this context, is stripped of romance. Organic materials matter, but they are not absolution. Production, even at its most conscientious, consumes water, energy and time. The more difficult work lies in longevity and circularity - in keeping garments in use long enough to justify their making at all. Quality becomes environmental strategy.

Portugal’s manufacturing ecosystem enables this approach while setting its limits. The country’s expertise in jersey and shirting, sustained through family-run factories and generational knowledge, cannot be scaled infinitely without erosion. Capacity is already tight. ISTO. treats this not as a problem to be solved but as a boundary to be respected. Ethical fashion, it implies, cannot grow at the velocity of fast fashion without hollowing itself out.

In literary terms, ISTO. aligns less with the manifesto than with the essay: provisional, exacting, revised through use. Like Montaigne, it resists finality. Like a well-worn garment, it improves not through attention but through familiarity.

What ISTO. ultimately offers is not an identity but a posture: elegance as the discipline of stopping in time; transparency as structure rather than spectacle; restraint as a repeated practice rather than a visual code.

If the brand operates like an essay, then conversation becomes its sharpest instrument. The coherence it sustains is not abstract but procedural, maintained through decisions made quietly and often against momentum.

To understand how this philosophy holds under the pressures of growth, accountability and time, we spoke with Pedro Palha, co-founder of ISTO., about restraint as discipline, transparency as structure, and why clothing works best when it disappears.

ISTO. has built a brand language around absence rather than assertion. As a co-founder, how do you practise restraint as an operational discipline, not merely an aesthetic posture?

Pedro Palha: For us, restraint starts far before design or communication — it’s operational. It’s deciding what not to launch, what not to restock, what not to say. We limit releases not to create scarcity, but to protect clarity: fewer products allow us to think more deeply about each one, forecast better, produce responsibly, and stand behind what we make. Restraint is embedded in our calendars, budgets, and production volumes. It’s discipline, not minimalism for its own sake.

Transparency is foundational to ISTO., from cost breakdowns to sourcing. Has radical transparency changed the way you design garments themselves, or reshaped the relationship between maker and wearer?

Pedro Palha: Both. When you know you’ll explain every decision - cost, origin, margin - you design differently. You remove unnecessary complexity. You choose materials and constructions you can justify honestly. But more importantly, transparency reshapes the relationship. It turns the garment into a shared object of understanding between maker and wearer. The customer doesn’t just consume, they participate knowingly.

Your pieces integrate quietly into daily life rather than signal identity. In a culture equating visibility with value, how do you define success when continuity, not recognition, is the goal?

Pedro Palha: Success, for us, is being worn repeatedly without thought. When a garment becomes part of someone’s routine - not a statement, not a question - that’s value. Recognition is fleeting; continuity is durable. If a piece is still relevant five years later, still chosen without hesitation, we’ve done our job.

ISTO. emerged in response to a system where quality and price rarely aligned honestly. Was the brand born more from frustration with industry economics, or a personal desire to live with fewer, better things?

Pedro Palha:They’re inseparable. The frustration came from living as a customer first, wanting fewer things but better ones, and not finding honesty in how they were priced or made. ISTO. was born from that gap. We didn’t want to fix fashion abstractly; we wanted to fix our own relationship with consumption.

Time plays a subtle but central role in ISTO.’s philosophy. Which moment matters most - the first wear, the fiftieth, or when the piece becomes unnoticeable through familiarity?

Pedro Palha:The moment it becomes unnoticeable. That’s when a garment stops asking for attention and starts giving something back: comfort, reliability, ease. The first wear is promise; the fiftieth is proof; familiarity is trust.

Many ISTO. customers build routines around your garments. How do your own daily rituals influence your view of clothing as infrastructure rather than expression?

Pedro Palha:My days are repetitive by necessity - work, travel, movement between places. Clothing, for me, has to disappear into that rhythm. When something works consistently, it frees mental space. That’s how we think about clothing: not as an expression first, but as support. Expression emerges naturally from ease.

ISTO. sits between utility, refinement, and ethics. When tensions arise, which value guides the final decision, and why?

Pedro Palha: Ethics tend to anchor the decision. Utility and refinement can be adjusted - ethics can’t. If something doesn’t align with our responsibility to people, materials, or time, we don’t do it. Constraints often lead to better outcomes anyway.

In an industry framing innovation as novelty, ISTO. evolves incrementally. Where does true innovation in clothing actually occur?

Pedro Palha: Often in restraint. Innovation happens when you improve fit by one centimetre, reduce waste by one step, or simplify a supply chain quietly. Materials and processes matter, but so does the discipline of saying no — to excess, to speed, to unnecessary change.

Portuguese manufacturing is part of ISTO.’s identity. How does producing locally shape your accountability?

Pedro Palha: Proximity creates responsibility. We know the factories, the people, the constraints. There’s no abstraction. That closeness forces better decisions — for craft traditions, yes, but also for modern expectations around labour, transparency, and impact. Accountability becomes personal.

ISTO. speaks to a customer who values discretion and clarity. How do you communicate without turning transparency into performance?

Pedro Palha: By sharing information only when it’s useful. Transparency isn’t about volume; it’s about relevance. We explain what matters, then step back. The goal isn’t to impress, but to be understood.

Comfort is often described emotionally as well as physically. What are people really responding to?

Pedro Palha: Certainty. Knowing how something will feel, how it will behave, how it will age. Comfort comes from trust as much as fabric - from garments that don’t surprise you, don’t demand attention, and don’t make you second-guess your choice.

As ISTO. matures, growth becomes philosophical as well as commercial. What does it mean for the brand to age well?

Pedro Palha: Aging well means staying legible. Keeping promises. Being recognisable not through logos or noise, but through consistency. If, over time, people trust us more - even as we grow slowly - then we’re aging with integrity.

---

Words and questions by AW.

Answers courtesy of Pedro Palha.

Photo courtesy of ISTO.