Babo: The Haftbefehl Story and the Price of Being Real.

When Aykut Anhan - the man the world knows as Haftbefehl - tells the director not to stop filming as his nose begins to bleed, it isn’t for effect. It’s a demand for truth.

“Es muss echt sein,” he insists. It has to be real.

That moment defines Babo - Die Haftbefehl Story, the 2025 Netflix documentary about one of Germany’s most paradoxical artists. For Haftbefehl, reality has always been a performance, and performance has always been a form of survival. The film promises “brutal honesty”, and delivers it with a cinematic precision that feels both intimate and industrial. But what happens when honesty itself becomes content?

Haftbefehl’s story has been told a hundred ways, but never quite like this. Born in Offenbach to Kurdish-Turkish parents, he grew up between cramped apartments, empty wallets, and the quiet aftermath of his father’s suicide. Before rap came chaos - small crimes, exile, addiction. Then, somehow, art. His voice, low and serrated, became a weapon. His language - a volatile mix of German, Turkish, Kurdish, and street slang - redrew the sound map of a country that had never quite known how to speak to itself. He didn’t just represent the margins; he taught them how to speak back.

If Jay-Z is Scorsese and Kendrick Lamar is Spike Lee, Haftbefehl is Fassbinder with an MPC. Brutal, excessive, ironic, self-exposing. He doesn’t perform the gangster myth; he deconstructs it from the inside. The brilliance of Babo is that it captures this split - the artist as both mythmaker and man, the self as both brand and wound.

Yet what makes the film fascinating is also what makes it uncomfortable. Haftbefehl knows he’s being consumed. He knows Netflix will turn his trauma into a digestible narrative, and that audiences will stream his collapse with the same hunger they once reserved for his swagger. But he consents. Not because he’s naïve, but because refusing to perform would mean disappearing. In a world that trades in authenticity, visibility requires exposure.

And so, he performs the breakdown as an act of control. If he must be a product, he’ll be the one designing the packaging.

Realness, once the moral compass of hip-hop, has become a metric - something that can be tagged, marketed, sold. The phrase “brutally honest” doesn’t mean unfiltered anymore; it means commercially optimized. Haftbefehl’s tears are shot in 4K, color-graded for credibility. Pain is the new performance, and confession the most efficient way to stay relevant.

But Haftbefehl is too self-aware to play the victim. He understands that every act of revelation is also a negotiation. By surrendering his narrative, he retains a strange kind of agency - the right to shape how his ruin is seen. It’s not redemption he’s after, but authorship.

The tragedy is that the film, for all its grit, sometimes loses sight of the world that built him. Offenbach becomes aesthetic rather than sociological - a background texture of concrete and graffiti instead of a living geography shaped by exclusion, migration, and class. The camera captures the symptoms - addiction, paranoia, despair - but rarely the system that produces them. The street becomes mood, not mechanism.

Haftbefehl himself never romanticized it. For him, the street was neither myth nor metaphor - it was geography, a place of necessity. When he speaks about his children, the bravado falls away. What remains is fear - fear of inheritance, of repetition, of watching history loop through bloodlines. His father’s suicide is the film’s silent gravity, pulling everything toward it. And somewhere between his own addictions and his children’s faces, Haftbefehl becomes less a rapper than a man trying to interrupt a pattern.

Still, the paradox persists. He says he’s in control, but can anyone control their story once it’s been optioned for streaming? He decides what to show, but Netflix decides what to cut. His confessions serve both his catharsis and their content strategy. The camera is witness and accomplice, therapist and exploiter.

Yet that tension - between control and surrender, truth and performance - is what gives Babo its strange, fractured beauty. It is both art and artifact, both critique and commodity. Haftbefehl’s genius is to embrace that contradiction fully, to use the same machinery that objectifies him as a means of self-definition. He’s too canny to believe in authenticity as purity. His version of honesty is transactional, jagged, alive.

The audience, of course, is never innocent. We, the viewers, demand the spectacle of truth while pretending to mourn its exploitation. We want to feel close to pain, but only from a safe distance - the kind of empathy that starts and ends with the play button. We talk about courage while treating confession as entertainment. Haftbefehl bleeds, and we call it content.

Babo – Die Haftbefehl Story is not flawless, but perhaps it shouldn’t be. Its power lies in its refusal to tidy anything up. It’s messy, inconsistent, and painfully human - like Haftbefehl himself. The film doesn’t solve the problem of authenticity; it exposes it. In doing so, it mirrors a culture that has turned vulnerability into spectacle, and sincerity into a commodity.

What’s left at the end isn’t catharsis, but fatigue - the exhaustion of a man who has given everything, even his collapse, to the machine that made him. When Haftbefehl says “Es muss echt sein”, it’s not a slogan. It’s a dare, hurled at an industry and an audience that no longer know what real looks like.

He is both the author and the casualty of his own myth. But he’s also something rarer - an artist brave enough to show that being real, in a world built on performance, is no longer a virtue. It’s an act of defiance.

—-

Words by AW.

Photo courtesy of Netflix.